President
Proposes a Law for Women?
Women used to be the ones that had
the least amount of rights, but now it maybe the men. The law states that
during a divorce if it is found that the woman had made the most money then she
would make the most decisions concerning the possessions and anything else
which means she has more power of the man she is divorcing. Also the law states
that during a divorce if it is found that the man had made the most money then
he would make the half of decisions concerning the possessions and half of
anything else which means if the man is a man in the marriage then in the
divorce they are equal. Can you believe that our president proposed this
ridiculous law even though he is a male?
Ever
heard of a woman faring more than a man? Does the United States of America only
care about the welfare of women after a divorce? Is it constitutional or
American for women to have rights that men are denied because of money. The
Declaration of Independence says that they have a right to, but do they?
If this law passes we will never be truly equals in
anything. This will be like the black widow and her mate. The female has all
the power because she is much bigger, and then when she done with him she eats
him. The women in society would take advantage of this law to the maximum by
only marrying a man to steal his possessions and have kids. Then the women of
America would divorce the guy and take everything he owns. The man will then be
homeless and he would have to run back to his mother in heartbreak and may stay
at her house for the rest of his sad life because someone used him and his
confidence is gone forever.
In
the state of Georgia everyone can vote as long as you are over 21, you are
citizen of the United States, you have lived at your current resident for at
least 30 days, and you are not in jail, so that makes almost everyone equal not
including the differences between gender. People in the U.S. can be biased
because some people think women are always angel like, but they are wrong.
There are millions of men who are deprived of the children they so love. The
mothers of children can be greedy and selfish when it comes to their children.
They hog their children thus keeping the man for seeing his children that he
deserves to see. The women think they always know what is best for their child
when in fact they maybe the worst parent to that child. Is it fair that people
are biased towards women and most of the time they get their way?
Men know women can be backsliders, abrasive, uncaring,
and can be ignoramus of the fact that they are not nor shall they ever be fit
to parent a child. Men can believe they are the better of the human species,
but they are wrong in thinking that we are weak. Men act sometimes just like
the old British men who wore those ugly powdered wigs.
Who should stand of for the men? The women who finally
have the upper hand? Should we help the men become equal to us even though
through all of the pain they have caused us for thousands of years? Men say
they are strong and will stand up for what they believe in, but are they
really? I hardly hear of a man protesting he is not equal with women, so why
should I help. Through the years men have said, “No I am the master of this
house,” but women are the actual ones running it. In a marriage there used to
be no partnership, but now there is because of all the women in history who
made the dream come true.
Considering
that this law is put into place what would the man do if the wife took
everything? My guess he would have to be self reliant and get or keep his job
and hopefully get over the heartbreak she has caused. He should accept what has
come and start anew. Ralph Waldo Emerson once said something like that. “Accept the place the divine providence has
found for you…..the connection of events.” (Self-Reliance 391) He wants man
to know that something caused his life to go this way and he should trust himself
to follow and make the best of the situation.
Should we let the government take over what we do every
waking second of our lives? I think we should peacefully protest this law
because the government should govern the most important things not something
about someone’s personal life. Our government is going the wrong way about
things and in “each instant losing some
of its integrity.” (Thoreau 412) The government is losing it and we need to
show it the way which is American and constitutional. If not our great nation
will fall and become like the other great nations that fell to silly things. I
personally do not want to become a “Roman Empire” in history.
Comments and criticism are needed in this format.
Did my paper support the thesis I
presented in the first paragraph?
Was my paper concluded well?
Strengths and weaknesses as a writer
Do you agree or disagree with my opinion
and the law?Why?
Work Cited
"Dutchess County Board
of Elections." Voter Registration Requirements. N.p., n.d. Web. 25
Nov.2012.<http://www.dutchesselections.com/Voting_Info/Register_to_Vote/index.htm>
Thoreau, Henry D. Civil
Disobedience. 2002. Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes. 7th
ed.
Needham: Prentice Hall, 2002. 412-13. Print.
Kennedy, John. F. Inaugural
Address. 2002. Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes. 7th
ed.
Needham: Prentice Hall, 2002. 196-200. Print.
Emerson, Ralph W. Self-Reliance.
2002. Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes. 7th ed.
Needham:
Prentice Hall, 2002. 391-92. Print.
I also have a video that goes with the essay.
If you could read my essay, answer the questions, watch my video, and comment here about the video I would very much appreciate that.
Link Below
